Logic really has no place in faith. By faith, I am referring to belief in something without needing to have concrete evidence to back it up. Belief in God or a Supreme Divine being requires this type of faith.
When you start to look for logical proof for the existence of God, you wind up running headlong into a brick wall. Most of these walls are built by other people who don’t want their world rocked. Logic requires concrete evidence, but if someone doesn’t accept the body of evidence given, you are back to square one. Therefore, I see no reason to argue with someone of the existence of God in any logic based debate.
“When we try to reach the infinite and the Divine by means of mere abstract terms or images, are we not even better than children trying to place a ladder against the sky?”
–Aristotle
It is hard enough for us to grasp infinity, let alone define God, attempting to do so is even harder when we attempt to use logic. Logic has it’s place, but theology doesn’t lend itself well to the use.
Usually when someone wants you to provide logical evidence of God’s existence, you are dealing with someone who is out for an argument.No matter what you say, even if well thought out, the other party will have a rebutle in the wings waiting to crush what you say.Most those who are trying to get you into these discussions are out to show that your faith is groundless and for not.You will never change their mind, so why even bother.The best way for you to express your faith is to live it. Through your expression, you show the only logical proof that I am aware of for your beliefs.
Now to totally eclipse what I’ve said, I will give you one example of a logical argument for the existence of the Divine. The following enigma is what I have found that answers that question for me.
There is no God but what cannot be comprehended
There is nothing that cannot be comprehended, but what is not conceivable
There is nothing not conceivable but what is immeasurable
There is nothing immeasurable but God
There is no God but what is not conceivable*
In this circular logic is the only answer that I have found that speaks volumes to me.
For more solid arguments, I will let others who have pondered longer and with more insight give their arguments to the world. Check out this link:
http://www.apologeticsinfo.org/outlines/godandlogic.html.
*The 21 Lessons of Merlyn by Douglas Monroe, pg 289.
Looking Back
Wow, I was trapped in the circular argument to justify my beliefs in a higher power. That feedback loop is really the only way I could grasp the idea something beyound this world, keeping things in order. This is a hard trap to escape. -Henry 19 JUN 2020
Cooper McPuppers
Baedon
Editor